"Actual Minds, Possible Worlds" by Jerome Bruner (1986)

I frequently re-read these things and go back in and edit the shit out of them so keep in mind this review may change. But I was directed here by Maria Popova. You know, the longtime, yellow-tinged "inspiration porn" queen of the creative Internet? She told me that this was a deeply insightful inquiry into the narrative arts by a reknowned psychologist. What I found was, someone who spent nine chapters out of 10 laddering, in excruciating detail, a proof leading up to a psychological point, only, after hours of torturous logic, to finally arrive at the psychological point: when people read things, they combine what they already understand with newly presented information and then use this entwined knowledge in order to form new thoughts. OH, GEEZ, THANKS A LOT, EINSTEIN. Maybe next you'd like to explain to me why exactly human beings enjoy eating tasty food, or why human beings try to avoid experiencing pain, citing a whole bunch of meticulously researched studies. A rare, genuine: No stars.

Sidenote: I'm beginning to think Maria Popova doesn't actually read the books that she promotes.

"A Swim in a Pond in the Rain" by George Saunders (2021)

You know how there's this huge gulf between the kinds of stories "literature people" like and the kinds of stories "non-literature people" like? How you can't understand why anyone could possibly think, say, Rachel Cusk's "Outline Trilogy" is required reading when Emily Giffin at least writes books that actually make me feel joy? Well, I'm no George Saunders fan but I'd say this does a pretty good job of at least trying to bridge that gap. Three stars.

"A Rhetoric of Irony" by Wayne C. Booth (1974)

(1) I read this very slowly. Turns out, there's only so much irony one person can handle in one sitting; (2) If you have no interest in literature then you’ll probably feel intense hatred if you attempted to read this; (3) But if you did, you'd find the writing style surprisingly enjoyable, even as he never bothers to dumb things down; (4) I suppose if you wanted a lengthy defense of why irony isn't necessarily the insouciant societal cancer it's often made out to be, this would be the place to turn; (5) You might even be surprised to stumble upon existential discussions of meaninglessness and knowledge and truth and human communion and, briefly, even God; (6) Have you ever thought of irony as frighteningly powerful? Well I didn't, until I read this; (7) One of his main attacks is on the notion that works of literature mean whatever one perceives them as meaning (which I understand to be part of postmodernism and multiculturalism,) which particularly triggered me because I feel my formal English instruction was dominated by that philosophy, and I do not now believe it served anyone's brains well; (8) Can I assure you that you'll feel enriched and rejuvenated upon completing the book? No. I find right now that I just wish all thinking would stop: my eyes hurt. Three stars.